Safety and efficacy of stent-assisted coil embolization with periprocedural dual antiplatelet therapy for the treatment of acutely ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

PURPOSE: Despite growing evidence for the effectiveness of stent-assisted coil embolization (SAC) in treating acutely ruptured aneurysms, the safety of stent placement in acute phase remains controversial because of concerns for stent-induced thromboembolism and hemorrhagic events attributable to the necessity of antiplatelet therapy. Therefore, we investigated the safety and efficacy of SAC with periprocedural dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared with the coiling-only technique to determine whether it is a promising treatment strategy for ruptured aneurysms. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 203 enrolled patients with acutely ruptured aneurysms, categorizing them into two groups: SAC and coiling-only groups. Comparative analyses between the two groups regarding angiographic results, clinical outcomes, and procedure-related complications were performed. A subgroup analysis of procedural complications was conducted on patients who did not receive chronic antithrombotic medications to alleviate their influence before hospitalization. RESULTS: 130 (64.0%) patients were treated using the coiling-only technique, whereas 73 (36.0%) underwent SAC. There was a trend to a higher complete obliteration rate (p = 0.061) and significantly lower recanalization rate (p = 0.030) at angiographic follow-up in the SAC group compared to the coiling-only group. Postprocedural cerebral infarction occurred less frequently in the SAC group (8.2%) than in the coiling-only group (17.7%), showing a significant difference (p = 0.044). Although the ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage rate was significantly higher in the SAC group than in the coiling-only group (26.2% vs. 9.3%, p = 0.031), the incidence of symptomatic ventriculostomy-related hemorrhage was comparable. Subgroup analysis excluding patients receiving chronic antithrombotic medications showed similar results. CONCLUSION: SAC with periprocedural DAPT could be a safe and effective treatment strategy for acutely ruptured aneurysms. Moreover, it might have a protective effect on postprocedural cerebral infarction without increasing the risk of symptomatic hemorrhagic complications.

Management of Incidental Carotid Cave Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Incidental diagnosis of saccular aneurysms is more common with the advent of imaging techniques. Because of the severe morbidity and mortality that they can cause, treatment is chased for them, either microsurgical treatment or endovascular, even when they are diagnosed incidentally. Carotid cave aneurysms are rare, and they seem to have a more benign course compared to other intracranial aneurysms, probably related to the physical enveloping effect of the surrounding structures. Yet, their microsurgical treatment is a serious challenge technically for the neurosurgeon, with its severe morbidity and mortality for the patient. Endovascular techniques have their risks, too. PURPOSE: In this paper, we analyzed and presented our series of incidentally diagnosed carotid cave aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The age, gender of patients, the size, laterality, and MR angiographic follow-up of aneurysms were reported. Their clinical results were noted. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients who had incidentally been diagnosed with 59 carotid cave aneurysms were followed up. No patient was microsurgically treated, but 15 patients had endovascular treatment for 15 aneurysms. The mean size of 15 treated aneurysms was 4.6 ± 2.1 (range = 2-10) mm, and it was 3.0 ± 1.5 (range = 1.7-10) mm for the untreated aneurysms (n = 44). There was no significant difference between the follow-up times of the treated and untreated groups (P = 0.487). The median follow-up of 59 aneurysms in 56 patients was 52 (mean = 49.6 ± 27.9, range = 1-124) months, with a total follow-up of 244 aneurysm years. None of the patients had subarachnoid hemorrhage related to carotid cave aneurysms during follow-up, and none of the aneurysms had shown growth. Two patients who had endovascular treatment had ischemic complications with minor neurologic deficits. CONCLUSION: Follow-up can be a reasonable option for the incidental aneurysms that are located and confined to the carotid cave. Additionally, TOF might be a reliable method for follow-up imaging of carotid cave aneurysms.

Advances in the Endovascular Management of Cerebrovascular Disease.

The field of endovascular neurosurgery has experienced remarkable progress over the last few decades. Endovascular treatments have continued to gain traction as the advancement of technology, technique, and procedural safety has allowed for the expansion of treatment indications of various cerebrovascular pathologies. Interventions such as the coiling of intracranial aneurysms, carotid artery stenting, mechanical thrombectomy in the setting of ischemic stroke, and endovascular embolization of arteriovenous malformations have all seen transformations in their safety and efficacy, expanding the scope of endovascularly treatable conditions and offering new hope to patients who may have otherwise not been candidates for surgical intervention. Despite this notable progress, challenges persist, including complications associated with device deployment and questions regarding long-term outcomes. This article explores the advancements in endovascular neurosurgical techniques, highlighting the impact on patient care, outcomes, and the evolution of traditional surgical methods.

Endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms using pCONUS2 HPC bridging device with single antiplatelet: A Case Series.

RATIONALE: Wide neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA) are technically challenging for both surgical and endovascular treatments. Endovascular treatment for WNBA often requires dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post stent insertion. Novel devices such as the pCONUS2 HPC neck bridging device have an HPC coating which reduces the device thrombogenicity. This theoretically allows for use of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), which would be advantageous, particularly in treating ruptured aneurysms. This case series aims to evaluate the safety of SAPT regimen only post stent insertion, by presenting our center early clinical experience in using pCONUS2 HPC neck bridging device in patients that are not suitable for DAPT. PATIENT CONCERNS: We report the cases of 3 patients (2 females, 1 male; range: 64-71 years old) who underwent coil embolization for WNBA using the pCONUS2 HPC device (2 unruptured WNBA, and 1 ruptured WNBA). As all 3 patients were allergic to Aspirin, they could only be started on SAPT post endovascular therapy. DIAGNOSIS: All 3 patients were diagnosed with WNBA on angiographic studies. Patient 1 had an unruptured left middle cerebral artery aneurysm; Patient 2 had a ruptured basilar tip aneurysm; Patient 3 had an unruptured anterior communicating artery (ACOM) aneurysm. INTERVENTIONS: All 3 WNBA were treated with pCONUS2 HPC neck bridging device. OUTCOMES: There were no immediate complications. The immediate angiographic result of aneurysm treatment in Patient 1 and Patient 2 demonstrated incomplete occlusions, with delayed complete occlusion of aneurysm in Patient 1 and growth of aneurysmal neck in Patient 2 on follow-up angiograms (range: 6-9 months). No major thrombo-embolic or hemorrhagic complications in the first 2 patients. For Patient 3, the immediate angiographic result of the treated aneurysm demonstrated complete occlusion. However, the patient readmitted 11 days post procedure with cerebral infarction, scoring 5 on the modified Rankin scale on discharge. LESSONS: pCONUS2 HPC as a neck bridging device in treating WNBA has yet to be shown superior to traditional techniques and devices. The theoretical advantage of HPC coating reducing its thrombogenicity requiring only SAPT is yet to be proven safe in clinical practice.

Factors affecting resolution of oculomotor nerve palsy following endovascular embolization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of endovascular embolization of posterior communicating artery (Pcom) aneurysms on concomitant oculomotor nerve palsy (OMNP) and factors affecting the effect of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with the Pcom aneurysms concomitant with OMNP were retrospectively enrolled for endovascular treatment of the aneurysms. All patients had the endovascular management. The clinical effect, degree of OMNP, size of the aneurysm, type of treatment, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and time from onset to treatment were analyzed on the resolution of OMNP. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients with 99 Pcom aneurysms were enrolled and treated endovascularly, with the success rate of 100%. Immediately after endovascular treatment, 75 aneurysms (75.75%) got complete occlusion, and 24 (24.24%) nearly complete occlusion. Followed up for 3-18 (mean 8.52±0.56) months, complete resolution of the OMNP was achieved in 63 patients (65.63%), partial resolution in 21 (21.88%), and non-recovery in the other 12 (12.50%). The degree of OMNP at onset, SAH, and time from onset to treatment were significantly (P<0.05) correlated with the resolution of OMNP. Univariate analysis revealed that younger age of the patient, degree of OMNP at onset, presence of subarachnoid hemorrhage, and time from disease onset to treatment were significantly (P<0.05) associated with the recovery of OMNP. Multivariate analysis revealed that the younger age, degree of OMNP at onset, and time from disease onset to treatment were significantly (P<0.05) associated with the recovery of OMNP. CONCLUSION: Endovascular embolization of Pcom aneurysms concomitant with OMNP can effectively improve the OMNP symptoms, especially for patients with moderate and a shorter history of OMNP. Younger age, degree of oculomotor nerve palsy at onset, and time from onset to treatment may significantly affect recovery of oculomotor nerve palsy.

ARISE I Consensus Review on the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) remain a challenging neurological diagnosis associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There is a plethora of microsurgical and endovascular techniques for the treatment of both ruptured and unruptured aneurysms. There is no definitive consensus as to the best treatment option for this cerebrovascular pathology. The Aneurysm, Arteriovenous Malformation, and Chronic Subdural Hematoma Roundtable Discussion With Industry and Stroke Experts discussed best practices and the most promising approaches to improve the management of brain aneurysms. METHODS: A group of experts from academia, industry, and federal regulators convened to discuss updated clinical trials, scientific research on preclinical system models, management options, screening and monitoring, and promising novel device technologies, aiming to improve the outcomes of patients with IA. RESULTS: Aneurysm, Arteriovenous Malformation, and Chronic Subdural Hematoma Roundtable Discussion With Industry and Stroke Experts suggested the incorporation of artificial intelligence to capture sequential aneurysm growth, identify predictors of rupture, and predict the risk of rupture to guide treatment options. The consensus strongly recommended nationwide systemic data collection of unruptured IA radiographic images for the analysis and development of machine learning algorithms for rupture risk. The consensus supported centers of excellence for preclinical multicenter trials in areas such as genetics, cellular composition, and radiogenomics. Optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging contrast-enhanced 3T vessel wall imaging are promising technologies; however, more data are needed to define their role in IA management. Ruptured aneurysms are best managed at large volume centers, which should include comprehensive patient management with expertise in microsurgery, endovascular surgery, neurology, and neurocritical care. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical and preclinical studies and scientific research on IA should engage high-volume centers and be conducted in multicenter collaborative efforts. The future of IA diagnosis and monitoring could be enhanced by the incorporation of artificial intelligence and national radiographic and biologic registries. A collaborative effort between academic centers, government regulators, and the device industry is paramount for the adequate management of IA and the advancement of the field.

Systematic Review of Treatment for Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Clipping Versus Coiling.

AIM: To compare endovascular coiling and surgical clipping for the evaluation of clinical outcomes in patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and three Chinese domestic electronic databases, namely, Wanfang, CNKI and VIP for studies published between January 1990 and January 2018. We included controlled clinical studies comparing clinical outcomes between surgical clipping and endovascular coiling treatments. Two researchers extracted the data and assessed the quality of the studies, and a meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5 software. RESULTS: We analysed a total of 23 controlled clinical studies including 117,796 cases. Meta-analysis demonstrated similar ischaemia rates between clipping and coiling with an odds ratio [OR] of 1.36 (95% CI: 0.77?2.40). The occlusion rate and bleeding risk were higher with clipping than coiling; the pooled ORs were 5.31 (95% CI: 3.07?9.19) and 2.39 (95% CI: 1.82?3.13), respectively. In addition, clipping resulted in a longer hospital stay (OR = 2.90, 95% CI: 2.14?3.65) than coiling did. Patients who underwent clipping had a higher short-term mortality (OR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.70?2.33) and neurological deficit rate (OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.73? 2.44) compared with those who underwent coiling. However, 1 year mortality and deficit rate were similar for both clipping and coiling, with pooled ORs of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.41?1.38) and 0.94 (95% CI: 0.53?1.67), respectively. Funnel plots did not demonstrate a publication bias, with the exception of ischaemic outcome, and sensitivity analysis showed consistent results. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that coiling is associated with a lower rate of occlusion, shorter hospital stay, lower bleeding risk and lower short-term mortality and morbidity compared with clipping. In terms of ischaemic risk, 1 year mortality and morbidity, coiling and clipping bear a similar risk. In addition, we speculate that surgical clipping may have a better outcome than endovascular coiling in the long term especially in young patients. Further research is needed to confirm our conclusion.

Coil Embolization of the Azygos Anterior Cerebral Artery Aneurysm: Three Case Reports.

The azygos anterior cerebral artery (ACA) is a rare anatomical anomaly. Clipping surgery has been conducted in approximately 30 reported cases because it is frequently associated with aneurysms. However, few cases in which coil embolization was performed have been reported. We report three cases of coil embolization for distal ACA aneurysms with distal azygos ACA at our institution in 7 years. All patients were over 65-year-old women with saccular aneurysms larger than 7 mm; two with subarachnoid hemorrhage and one with an unruptured aneurysm. No patient had surgical complications associated with coil embolization. Coil embolization is also useful for large aneurysms in the distal azygos ACA, and its indication for treatment could be broadened.

Endovascular outcomes for anterior choroidal artery aneurysms: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anterior choroidal artery (AchoA) aneurysms are relatively rare compared to other types of aneurysms. However, the occurrence of transient or permanent occlusion of the choroidal artery during endovascular or surgical treatment is an uncommon but potentially serious complication. In this study, we aim to investigate the safety and efficacy profile of endovascular treatment (EVT) for AchoA aneurysms. METHODS: The primary outcome of interest was angiographic and clinical outcomes. Secondary outcome variables transient and permanent ischemic complications, symptomatic choroidal artery occlusion and retreatment rates. A random-effects model was used to calculate prevalence rates and their corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CI), and subgroup analyses were performed to assess the complication rates for Type 1(arterial type, directly arising from ICA) and Type 2(neck type, arising from AchoA branch)) AchoA aneurysms, ruptured vs non-ruptured and for flow diverter (FD) treatment versus coiling. RESULTS: Our study included 10 studies with 416 patients with 430 AchoA aneurysms. The overall good clinical outcome rate (mRS score 0-2) is 94.5 % with a retreatment rate of 2.0 %. A subgroup analysis showed no statistical difference between coiling(75.3 %) and flow diverter(80.9 %) treatment in terms of complete occlusion(p-value:0.62). Overall permanent complication rate is 1.4 % (p-value:0.54) and transient ischemic complications rate is 4.2 %(p-value:0.61). Symptomatic choroidal artery occlusion rate is 0.8 %(p-value:0.51)Type 2 AchoA aneurysms had a significantly higher complication rate of 9.8 % (p-value<0.05) compared to Type 1 aneurysms. Unruptured aneurysms have significantly better clinical outcomes than ruptured aneurysms(OR: 0.11; [0.02;0.5], p-value:<0.05) CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of AchoA aneurysms demonstrated positive clinical results, with low rates of retreatment and complications. Coiling and flow diverters proved similar outcomes in achieving aneurysm occlusion. Ruptured aneurysms have lower good clinical outcomes comparing to unruptured aneurysms. Type 2 AchoA aneurysms had a higher risk of complications compared to Type 1.

Wall Enhancement of Coiled Intracranial Aneurysms Is Associated with Aneurysm Recanalization: A Cross-Sectional Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Wall enhancement of untreated intracranial aneurysms on MR imaging is thought to predict aneurysm instability. Wall enhancement or enhancement of the aneurysm cavity in coiled intracranial aneurysms is discussed controversially in the literature regarding potential healing mechanisms or adverse inflammatory reactions. Our aim was to compare the occurrence of aneurysm wall enhancement and cavity enhancement between completely occluded intracranial aneurysms and recanalized aneurysms after initially complete coil embolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center cross-sectional study, we evaluated intracranial aneurysms after successful coil embolization for aneurysm recanalization, wall enhancement, and cavity enhancement with 3T MR imaging. We then compared the incidence of wall enhancement and cavity enhancement of completely occluded aneurysms with aneurysms with recanalization using the χ2 test and performed a multivariate linear regression analysis with recanalization size as an independent variable. RESULTS: We evaluated 59 patients (mean age, 54.7 [SD, 12.4] years; 48 women) with 60 intracranial aneurysms and found a significantly higher incidence of wall enhancement in coiled aneurysms with recanalization (n=38) compared with completely occluded aneurysms (n = 22, P = .036). In addition, there was a significantly higher incidence of wall enhancement in aneurysms with recanalization of >3 mm (P = .003). In a multivariate linear regression analysis, wall enhancement (P = .010) and an increase of overall aneurysm size after embolization (P < .001) were significant predictors of recanalization size (corrected R 2= 0.430, CI 95%). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of aneurysm wall enhancement is increased in coiled intracranial aneurysms with recanalization and is associated with recanalization size.

Large Single-Center Experience with Short-Term Follow-up of Neqstent-Assisted Coiling.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms has historically proved difficult with variable outcomes. Different endovascular techniques such as balloon-assisted coiling, stent-assisted coiling, or intrasaccular devices provide a varied range of efficacy and safety. Neqstent-assisted coiling is a new device and technique that aim to provide a maximum of both. We analyzed the early clinical and radiologic outcomes after the use of this new technique and device in our practice. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective analysis of ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms treated with the Neqstent. The primary radiologic outcomes were quantified on DSA, CTA, or MRA using the modified Raymond-Roy criteria. The outcomes were defined as immediate complete occlusion (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1) and complete (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1) and adequate occlusion (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1 and modified Raymond-Roy criteria 2) at 6 months posttreatment. The primary safety outcome was the rate of device-related adverse events. Secondary safety outcomes included time to discharge and change in the mRS score at 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty patients were treated with the Neqstent from November 2020 to January 2023. Nine had unruptured aneurysms, and 11 were patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage due to ruptured aneurysms. Eighteen of 20 aneurysms (90%) treated demonstrated complete occlusion (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1) on immediate postembolization angiograms. Sixteen of 17 aneurysms treated (94.1%) remained adequately occluded on 6-month follow-up (modified Raymond-Roy criteria 1 and modified Raymond-Roy criteria 2). Immediate postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients; only 1 patient had residual neurologic deficits at 6 months (mRS = 2). CONCLUSIONS: Management of large, wide-neck aneurysms remains difficult, with high rates of recurrence and complications. The use of the Neqstent shows promising short-term results for the treatment of complex wide-neck aneurysms. Initial complication rates for our cohort were relatively high. However, this result is likely related to the initial learning experience of device deployment and the use of antiplatelets.

Medulla and cervical cord contrast-induced encephalopathy detected by neuromonitoring during coil embolization of posterior circulation aneurysms.

Understanding the risks of contrast-induced encephalopathy (CIE), a serious complication of contrast agents, is crucial in endovascular treatment. We present the case of a 73-year-old woman who developed CIE in the medulla and cervical cord during coil embolization for unruptured left basilar-superior cerebellar artery and basilar artery tip aneurysms. The CIE was identified via neuromonitoring. In this case, spinal cord ischemia might have occurred due to reduced perfusion pressure after inserting the distal access catheter (DAC) in the vertebral artery. Multiple injections of contrast medium via the DAC during coil embolization likely contributed to an unusual form of CIE. Extreme caution is warranted during endovascular treatments involving the posterior circulation, due to the relatively high incidence of contrast-mediated encephalopathy, which can lead to severe consequences such as perforator infarction. Neuromonitoring is very useful for the early detection of neurological changes, particularly because intraoperative angiography may not reveal all irregularities.

[Ruptured mycotic cerebral aneurysm in an adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma patient undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation].

A 63-year-old man with adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation from an HLA-matched unrelated donor. On day 17 after transplantation, chest computed tomography (CT) showed nodules in the lower lobes of both lungs, and invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) was suspected. Treatment with liposomal amphotericin B was started, and improvement of infectious lesions was confirmed with CT on day 28. The antifungal agent was changed to voriconazole on day 52 because of progressive renal dysfunction. Disorders of consciousness and paralysis of the left upper and lower extremities developed on day 61. Brain CT showed subcortical hemorrhage in the right parietal and occipital lobes, and the patient died on day 62. An autopsy revealed filamentous fungi, suspected to be Aspergillus, in the pulmonary nodules and a ruptured cerebral aneurysm. Although IPA occurs in 10% of transplant recipients, vigilant monitoring for mycotic cerebral aneurysms is required to prevent hematogenous dissemination of Aspergillus, which is associated with a high mortality rate.

Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping in the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage in the elderly: a multicenter cohort study.

The comparability of endovascular coiling over neurosurgical clipping has not been firmly established in elderly patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH). Data were obtained from all patients with aSAH aged ≥60 across three tertiary hospitals in Singapore from 2014 to 2019. Outcome measures included modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at 3 and at 6 months, and in-hospital mortality. Of the 134 patients analyzed, 84 (62.7%) underwent coiling and 50 (37.3%) underwent clipping. The endovascular group showed a higher incidence of good mRS score 0-2 at 3 months (OR = 2.45 [95%CI:1.16-5.20];p = 0.018), and a lower incidence of in-hospital mortality (OR = 0.31 [95%CI:0.10-0.91];p = 0.026). There were no significant difference between the two treatment groups in terms of good mRS score at 6 months (OR = 1.98 [95%CI:0.97-4.04];p = 0.060). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications, such as aneurysm rebleed, delayed hydrocephalus, delayed ischemic neurological deficit and venous thromboembolism between the two treatment groups. However, fewer patients in the coiling group developed large infarcts requiring decompressive craniectomy (OR = 0.32 [95%CI:0.12-0.90];p = 0.025). Age, admission WFNS score I-III, and coiling were independent predictors of good functional outcomes at 3 months. Only age and admission WFNS score I-III remained significant predictors of good functional outcomes at 6 months. Endovascular coiling, compared with neurosurgical clipping, is associated with significantly better short term outcomes in carefully selected elderly patients with aSAH. Maximal intervention is recommended for aSAH in the young elderly age group and those with favorable WFNS scores.

Initial Experiences with the Trenza Embolization Device for the Treatment of Wide-Neck Intracranial Aneurysms: A 12-Patient Case Series.

The Trenza embolization device is a frame coil implant with flow-disruption properties and is a new alternative to treat challenging mid-to-large-sized broad-neck bifurcation or sidewall aneurysms. We conducted an observational single-center retrospective study of 12 consecutive patients treated for 10 unruptured and 2 ruptured 6- to 12-mm broad-neck bifurcation or sidewall aneurysms with the Trenza device during 2022-2023. The median patient age was 64 years (interquartile range, 59-70 years), 58% were women, the median largest aneurysm diameter was 9.6 mm (interquartile range, 7.5-11.9 mm), the median dome-to-neck ratio was 1.8 (interquartile range, 1.6-1.9), the most common aneurysm locations were the anterior communicating artery (33%) and basilar artery tip (33%). After a median follow-up of 6.5 months, adequate aneurysm occlusion was achieved in 83%. There were 3 major ischemic complications (25%), leading to 2 permanent neurologic deficits (17%) and 1 transient neurologic deficit (8%). There was 1 fatal rupture of a treated aneurysm 1.6 months after the index treatment. Two patients were retreated (17%). Ischemic complications occurred in patients after a too-dense coil packing at the base of the aneurysm. No technical issues related to the device were encountered. In summary, an adequate aneurysm occlusion rate was achieved using the Trenza-assisted coiling technique for otherwise challenging mid-to-large-sized broad-neck aneurysms. Ischemic complications seemed to occur following overdense coiling at the base of the aneurysm.

Prasugrel Single Antiplatelet Therapy versus Aspirin and Clopidogrel Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Flow Diverter Treatment for Cerebral Aneurysms: A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The optimal antiplatelet regimen after flow diverter treatment of cerebral aneurysms is still a matter of debate. A single antiplatelet therapy might be advantageous in determined clinical scenarios. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy versus aspirin and clopidogrel dual antiplatelet therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of 4 retrospective multicenter studies including ruptured and unruptured aneurysms treated with flow diversion using either prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy or dual antiplatelet therapy. Primary end points were the occurrence of any kind of procedure- or device-related thromboembolic complications and complete aneurysm occlusion at the latest radiologic follow-up (mean, 18 months). Dichotomized comparisons of outcomes were performed between single antiplatelet therapy and dual antiplatelet therapy. Additionally, the influence of various patient- and aneurysm-related variables on the occurrence of thromboembolic complications was investigated using multivariable backward logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients with 251 aneurysms were included, 90 (40.5%) in the single antiplatelet therapy and 132 (59.5%) in the dual antiplatelet therapy group. The primary outcome-procedure- or device-related thromboembolic complications-occurred in 6 patients (6.6%) of the single antiplatelet therapy and in 12 patients (9.0%) of the dual antiplatelet therapy group (P = .62; OR, 0.712; 95% CI, 0.260-1.930). The primary treatment efficacy end point was reached in 82 patients (80.4%) of the single antiplatelet therapy and in 115 patients (78.2%) of the dual antiplatelet therapy group (P = .752; OR, 1.141; 95% CI, 0.599-2.101). Logistic regression showed that non-surface-modified flow diverters (P = .014) and fusiform aneurysm morphology (P = .004) significantly increased the probability of thromboembolic complications. CONCLUSIONS: Prasugrel single antiplatelet therapy after flow diverter treatment may be as safe and effective as dual antiplatelet therapy and could, therefore, be a valid alternative in selected patients. Further prospective comparative studies are required to validate our findings.

Safety and Outcomes of the Off-Label Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms with Pipeline Embolization Device: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Off-label use of pipeline embolization devices (PEDs) has been increasingly used for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Numerous articles have highlighted the safety and effectiveness of PED placement from independent centers for both on- and off-label indications. There remains a paucity of information that considers overall safety and efficacy of off-label PED placement across the existing literature. Our objective is to systematically review the safety and occlusion outcomes of PED off-label use in intracranial aneurysm embolization. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed and Embase was performed to identify studies on off-label use of PED. The selected studies provided relevant information, including study characteristics, patient demographics, clinical outcomes, peri-procedural complications, and long-term outcomes, which were subjected to meta-analysis. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. There were 747 patients and 791 aneurysms included for analysis. Among the patient, 69.2% were female, with an age range of 16 to 80 years. The overall incidence rates for ischemic and hemorrhagic complications were 7% (95% CI: 4%-10%) and 2% (95% CI: 0%-4%), respectively. The mortality rate was 1% (95% CI: 0%-4%). The occlusion rates of aneurysm at initial follow up and 1 year follow-up were 82% (95% CI: 72%-91%) and 81% (95%CI: 75%-86%), respectively. Meta-regression analysis indicated no correlation between occlusion rate and factors such as age, sex, aneurysm size, location, morphology, rupture, or history of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite variations in results observed in single-center studies, this meta-analysis provides evidence supporting the safety and efficacy of PED off-label use.

Optimizing Patient Care: A Multicentric Study on the Clinical Impact of Sim&Size™ Simulation Software in Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment With Pipeline Embolization Devices.

BACKGROUND: To determine the clinical effects (stent size, and number of stents used) of the Sim&Size™ simulation software on the endovascular treatment of unruptured saccular intracranial aneurysms with Pipeline Embolization Devices (PED). METHODS: This study is a retrospective analytical multicenter study of patients treated with PED (Flex and Flex with SHIELD) for intracranial aneurysm in FOSCAL clinic and CHU de Montpellier. RESULTS: The study included 253 patients, of which 75 were treated in Colombia and 178 were treated in France. The majority of patients were women (83.8%), with a median age of 57.48 years, and had large vessel location (88.1%), with most aneurysms located in the ICA paraclinoid segment (56.8%). Patients in the group with Sim&Size™ simulation had shorter stents than those without simulation (15.62 mm versus 17.36 mm, P-value = 0.001). Also, a lower proportion of these patients required more than one stent (1.4% versus 7.3%, P-value = 0.022). There were 7 complications reported in the group that used the Sim&Size™ simulation software, compared to 9 complications in the group that did not use the software. CONCLUSIONS: Using Sim&Size™ simulation software for endovascular treatment of patients with intracranial aneurysms using PED reduces the stent length and decreasing the number of devices needed per treatment.